Editing Talk:Flamethrower
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A Frank Opinion by an Irate and Tired Player | A Frank Opinion by an Irate and Tired Player | ||
This 'weapon' is useless when it comes to doing any kind of real damage. Not only is it unable to even scratch armor, but spraying it directly into an unarmored car at point blank range will have almost no effect on the occupants. The Flamethrower may be scary and seem impressive on the outset, but it's not good for anything more than spooking and stressing. And by the time you're close enough to use it, you could have demoralised your target from long range with a better weapon. | This 'weapon' is useless when it comes to doing any kind of real damage. Not only is it unable to even scratch armor, but spraying it directly into an unarmored car at point blank range will have almost no effect on the occupants. The Flamethrower may be scary and seem impressive on the outset, but it's not good for anything more than spooking and stressing. And by the time you're close enough to use it, you could have demoralised your target from long range with a better weapon. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Con- Does not set your target on fire, which is really the first thing that you would have expected it to do. | Con- Does not set your target on fire, which is really the first thing that you would have expected it to do. | ||
Con- Everyone will laugh at you. Especially me. | Con- Everyone will laugh at you. Especially me. | ||
--Delfin0 | |||