Talk:Scouting (skill) - Revision history

Trifler: Sounds good

2011-02-17T01:44:08Z

Sounds good

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 17 February 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	**Instead of removing the 'Vehicle Suitability' section, how about we remove the reference and just leave it at "the car the scout is in" for the list near the top? Then we have Sam's statement in the 'Vehicle Suitability' section and all's good. --[[User:Trifler\|Trifler]] 09:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)		**Instead of removing the 'Vehicle Suitability' section, how about we remove the reference and just leave it at "the car the scout is in" for the list near the top? Then we have Sam's statement in the 'Vehicle Suitability' section and all's good. --[[User:Trifler\|Trifler]] 09:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
	***I'd keep the reference somewhere (maybe at the quote?) just because the forum search is so unpleasant, and having a link that goes right to the post could be handy.--[[User:Wikiadmin\|Wikiadmin]] 15:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)		***I'd keep the reference somewhere (maybe at the quote?) just because the forum search is so unpleasant, and having a link that goes right to the post could be handy.--[[User:Wikiadmin\|Wikiadmin]] 15:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
			***Sounds good. Change made. :)

Wikiadmin: reference discussion

2011-02-16T15:46:44Z

reference discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:46, 16 February 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	**Not sure if I understand you correctly but if you mean it's mentioned in the forum thread then we should probably keep it. Virtually nobody actually reads references unless they doubt the efficacy of the article. Plus, it's a forum thread and nobody wants to go digging through a thread to find it. If I misunderstood then nevermind. --[[User:Trifler\|Trifler]] 11:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)		**Not sure if I understand you correctly but if you mean it's mentioned in the forum thread then we should probably keep it. Virtually nobody actually reads references unless they doubt the efficacy of the article. Plus, it's a forum thread and nobody wants to go digging through a thread to find it. If I misunderstood then nevermind. --[[User:Trifler\|Trifler]] 11:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
	**Instead of removing the 'Vehicle Suitability' section, how about we remove the reference and just leave it at "the car the scout is in" for the list near the top? Then we have Sam's statement in the 'Vehicle Suitability' section and all's good. --[[User:Trifler\|Trifler]] 09:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)		**Instead of removing the 'Vehicle Suitability' section, how about we remove the reference and just leave it at "the car the scout is in" for the list near the top? Then we have Sam's statement in the 'Vehicle Suitability' section and all's good. --[[User:Trifler\|Trifler]] 09:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
			***I'd keep the reference somewhere (maybe at the quote?) just because the forum search is so unpleasant, and having a link that goes right to the post could be handy.--[[User:Wikiadmin\|Wikiadmin]] 15:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Trifler: Comment on Vehicle Suitability convo

2011-02-16T09:25:04Z

Comment on Vehicle Suitability convo

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:25, 16 February 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*Wondering if the 'Vehicle Suitability' section can be removed since it seems to only be a section for the almost-quote which is now referenced in the Notes section. --[[User:Wikiadmin\|Wikiadmin]] 06:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC)		*Wondering if the 'Vehicle Suitability' section can be removed since it seems to only be a section for the almost-quote which is now referenced in the Notes section. --[[User:Wikiadmin\|Wikiadmin]] 06:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
	**Not sure if I understand you correctly but if you mean it's mentioned in the forum thread then we should probably keep it. Virtually nobody actually reads references unless they doubt the efficacy of the article. Plus, it's a forum thread and nobody wants to go digging through a thread to find it. If I misunderstood then nevermind. --[[User:Trifler\|Trifler]] 11:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)		**Not sure if I understand you correctly but if you mean it's mentioned in the forum thread then we should probably keep it. Virtually nobody actually reads references unless they doubt the efficacy of the article. Plus, it's a forum thread and nobody wants to go digging through a thread to find it. If I misunderstood then nevermind. --[[User:Trifler\|Trifler]] 11:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
			**Instead of removing the 'Vehicle Suitability' section, how about we remove the reference and just leave it at "the car the scout is in" for the list near the top? Then we have Sam's statement in the 'Vehicle Suitability' section and all's good. --[[User:Trifler\|Trifler]] 09:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Trifler at 11:20, 14 February 2011

2011-02-14T11:20:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:20, 14 February 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*Wondering if the 'Vehicle Suitability' section can be removed since it seems to only be a section for the almost-quote which is now referenced in the Notes section. --[[User:Wikiadmin\|Wikiadmin]] 06:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC)		*Wondering if the 'Vehicle Suitability' section can be removed since it seems to only be a section for the almost-quote which is now referenced in the Notes section. --[[User:Wikiadmin\|Wikiadmin]] 06:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
			**Not sure if I understand you correctly but if you mean it's mentioned in the forum thread then we should probably keep it. Virtually nobody actually reads references unless they doubt the efficacy of the article. Plus, it's a forum thread and nobody wants to go digging through a thread to find it. If I misunderstood then nevermind. --[[User:Trifler\|Trifler]] 11:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikiadmin: Created page with '*Wondering if the 'Vehicle Suitability' section can be removed since it seems to only be a section for the almost-quote which is now referenced in the Notes section. --~~~~'

2011-02-14T06:30:18Z

Created page with '*Wondering if the 'Vehicle Suitability' section can be removed since it seems to only be a section for the almost-quote which is now referenced in the Notes section. --~~~~'

New page

*Wondering if the 'Vehicle Suitability' section can be removed since it seems to only be a section for the almost-quote which is now referenced in the Notes section. --[[User:Wikiadmin|Wikiadmin]] 06:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:46, 16 February 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	**Not sure if I understand you correctly but if you mean it's mentioned in the forum thread then we should probably keep it. Virtually nobody actually reads references unless they doubt the efficacy of the article. Plus, it's a forum thread and nobody wants to go digging through a thread to find it. If I misunderstood then nevermind. --[[User:Trifler\|Trifler]] 11:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)		**Not sure if I understand you correctly but if you mean it's mentioned in the forum thread then we should probably keep it. Virtually nobody actually reads references unless they doubt the efficacy of the article. Plus, it's a forum thread and nobody wants to go digging through a thread to find it. If I misunderstood then nevermind. --[[User:Trifler\|Trifler]] 11:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
	**Instead of removing the 'Vehicle Suitability' section, how about we remove the reference and just leave it at "the car the scout is in" for the list near the top? Then we have Sam's statement in the 'Vehicle Suitability' section and all's good. --[[User:Trifler\|Trifler]] 09:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)		**Instead of removing the 'Vehicle Suitability' section, how about we remove the reference and just leave it at "the car the scout is in" for the list near the top? Then we have Sam's statement in the 'Vehicle Suitability' section and all's good. --[[User:Trifler\|Trifler]] 09:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
			***I'd keep the reference somewhere (maybe at the quote?) just because the forum search is so unpleasant, and having a link that goes right to the post could be handy.--[[User:Wikiadmin\|Wikiadmin]] 15:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)